7 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif
DementedM said in April 24th, 2007 at 10:06 am

This was very interesting, thank you for posting it. The question that wasn’t addressed, in my opinion, was whether or not the genetic history of the parents would make their embryos unacceptable for donation. For example, if the cause of infertility was passed down in the genetics, would couples want those embryos? What about asthma? Heart disease? Cancer? Mental illness? Would it be ethical to even offer those embryos for adoption? Would adoption make PGD a standard practice and if so would that mean embryos that don’t pass PGD can be destroyed without protest?

My understanding of my situation is that there is no embryo adoption program for me to utilize. Nor can I donate unused embryos for research. Right now the issue is moot since we are still building our family. However, I hope if we do have any embryos left once we are done with treatment that there will be options other than destruction open to us.

As much as I disagree with the pro-life movement, if they can use their lobby to allow couples to make choices other than destruction, I would welcome their meddling (assuming they can keep the science intact that the embryo to baby ratio is NOT 1:1). Certainly, we should not follow in Europe’s footsteps!

M

mygif
billige Klettergriffe said in May 23rd, 2007 at 6:14 pm

very hard cover, also for a magazine like the time.

Peter from Germany :-)

mygif
ignorance killed the cure for cancer at ZLog said in June 21st, 2007 at 3:30 am

[…] To get to the root of this argument we have to put the facts out where adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells are obtained.  As the name suggests, embryonic stem cells are obtained from embryos.  Most commonly these come from embryos used in in vitro fertilization (ie “test-tube” babies).  These are left-overs.  From here there used to be one choice, freeze them and keep using them.  The embryos can last more than 100 years and can be used by the couple that had them made or be “adopted.”  Current government released statistics by the Secretary of Health and Human Services in April state that 88% of the embryos in storage are being used by the “creating families.”  The other 12% accounts for a total of 48,000 embryos, plenty for research.  Now I was not able to find statistics for those 12% not used but the general feel I got from people that worked in Fertility Clinics was that they weren’t really touched, more forgotten.  (Source)  So what’s the other choice for these embryos?  Stem cell research. […]

mygif

[…] Embryo Adoption, Stem Cell Research, Partial Birth Abortion Oh My … … adopted”.  Today I received the draft results of a US government … rate of 30%, these 48,000 embryos could result in the birth of … future vision (8) genetics (14) Gesture Control (12) implants (3) … http://www.docinthemachine.com/2007/04/19/embryoadoption […]

mygif
Louisiana: children locked in freezers « The Stem Cell said in October 23rd, 2007 at 1:21 pm

[…] In Loiusiana, unwanted, spare embryos become wards of fertility doctors, who are charged with keeping them safe until they can be “adopted” and implanted elsewhere. This ignores the fact that the vast majority of embryos are never adopted. A recent post by an IVF physician at docinthemachine.com says: […]

mygif
stem cell research clinics in germany said in July 2nd, 2008 at 8:55 am

[…] the draft results of a US government &8230 rate of 30%, these 48,000 embryos could result …http://docinthemachine.com/2007/04/19/embryoadoption/Read “Free Porn Clips! 96750 FREE PORNO Movies!” at General Discussion Forum … torture porn […]

mygif
anti-supernaturalist said in May 1st, 2009 at 8:14 pm

You’re confusing Biology with an area belonging to an unhappy conjunction of Law, Religion, and Philosophy. The relevant concept is not that of human being — but the concept of a person.

• the concept of a person is not a biological one

‘Person’ won’t be found in a medical dictionary. A human being becomes a person when a culture bestows *membership* on someone formerly outside the group.

Considering newborns in traditional cultures, not all who are born get chosen to be persons. A brief familiarity with fable and myth based on exposure of newborns should dispel the facile equation of ‘human being’ with ‘person.’ (Search: pater potestas)

In contemporary state level cultures, established law and custom work together not always comfortably to determine what a “reasonable person’s” concept of a person is.

• The real issue is control –

male domination of women, including dismissing their rights over their own bodies. Religious zealots who call abortion murder do not rise to the level of a reasonable person.

By trying to extend the concept of a person backward to cover fertilized human eggs and zygotes, male legislators placate right-wing moral absolutists who cannot ever win popular support in a secular and open society.

They hope to return control of reproduction and birth to the paternalistic “norm” promoted by so-called great monotheisms — judaism, xianity, and islam.

anti-supernaturalist

Leave A Reply

 Username (*required)

 Email Address (*private)

 Website (*optional)

Please Note: Comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comments