Comments on: Flawed Research: The Hidden Weakness of Peer Review & More Falsified Stem Cells http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/ transforming medicine with tomorrow’s technology Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:34:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: report internet fraud http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-106687 report internet fraud Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:13:45 +0000 http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-106687 [...] peer review process that allow crap research to get published. A real wake up for those trying to dhttp://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/Guardian eCommerce Report Internet Fraud File A Complaint ...Committed to consumer online safety, [...] […] peer review process that allow crap research to get published. A real wake up for those trying to dhttp://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/Guardian eCommerce Report Internet Fraud File A Complaint …Committed to consumer online safety, […]

]]> By: post mi stem cell research http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-103440 post mi stem cell research Sat, 31 May 2008 06:31:13 +0000 http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-103440 [...] peer review process that allow crap research to get published. A real wake up for those trying to dhttp://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/Stem Cell Research and Therapy Resource Center News - IndexRead full-text medical journal articles [...] […] peer review process that allow crap research to get published. A real wake up for those trying to dhttp://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/Stem Cell Research and Therapy Resource Center News - IndexRead full-text medical journal articles […]

]]> By: Jim http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-3345 Jim Wed, 21 Feb 2007 21:21:46 +0000 http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-3345 So what is the answer? NATURE tried open review and it was something of a bust. PLoS does open journals, people have also asked us if we will post them. But if internet commentary lacks value, does the community just accept that all review systems ( not just medicine ) are flawed and stick with the least flawed now? There are exceptions where bad stuff passes review but what % is that? So what is the answer? NATURE tried open review and it was something of a bust.

PLoS does open journals, people have also asked us if we will post them. But if internet commentary lacks value, does the community just accept that all review systems ( not just medicine ) are flawed and stick with the least flawed now?

There are exceptions where bad stuff passes review but what % is that?

]]> By: Pure Pedantry http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-3255 Pure Pedantry Tue, 20 Feb 2007 02:28:04 +0000 http://docinthemachine.com/2007/02/15/flawedpeers/#comment-3255 <strong>Grand Rounds, vol. 3 no. 22</strong> Hi everyone, and welcome to Grand Rounds, vol. 3 no. 22. Since the Oscars are this Sunday -- and I know we all look forward to this yearly 4 hour marathon of farcical self-absorption -- this edition of Grand Rounds... Grand Rounds, vol. 3 no. 22

Hi everyone, and welcome to Grand Rounds, vol. 3 no. 22. Since the Oscars are this Sunday — and I know we all look forward to this yearly 4 hour marathon of farcical self-absorption — this edition of Grand Rounds…

]]>